tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post2723359469249632407..comments2024-03-22T02:17:52.141-07:00Comments on Bad UFOs: Skepticism, UFOs, and The Universe: Did the NASA Hypersonic X-43A Play a Role in the "Tic Tac UFO" Incident?Robert Sheafferhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15324537021429419111noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-2597849160117937212019-07-15T16:48:04.086-07:002019-07-15T16:48:04.086-07:00The clip of the x43A clearly shows a contrail repo...The clip of the x43A clearly shows a contrail report out the back of the craft where the tic-tac craft doesn'tMARKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15646391960163391637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-79778442520400314352019-07-15T16:44:43.834-07:002019-07-15T16:44:43.834-07:00The clip of the Hyper sonic x-43A clearly shows a ...The clip of the Hyper sonic x-43A clearly shows a contrail the tic-tac object has nothing.MARKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15646391960163391637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-46590867097517851412018-07-08T13:55:28.754-07:002018-07-08T13:55:28.754-07:00First, I find it curious that NASA would not infor...First, I find it curious that NASA would not inform the military about this possible flight of the Hypersonic X-43A. Why would NASA send a craft into a naval battle group exercise? Second, does the X-43A have similar flight characteristics as observed by the F18 pilots or radar/sensor operators on ship? Third, the fairly detailed doucment described in this article/post most likely did not come from a direct military source. It most likely came from a contracting source that analysed the incident such as BAASS etc. I always appreciate a skeptical inquiry solution to these type of events. However you also need to be skeptical of the solution itself when there is no easy answer. nsurroundhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05064805283115665217noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-59094668217868708542018-06-27T14:52:16.616-07:002018-06-27T14:52:16.616-07:00If it was a secret test by NASA why did the video ...If it was a secret test by NASA why did the video of the tic tac show no exhaust plume. With eye witness accounts in actual aircraft detailing how the event took place with manoeuvrability that doesn't display what jet aircraft do.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02287339444344077123noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-88047850531042286332018-06-18T17:28:46.838-07:002018-06-18T17:28:46.838-07:001) I recently found a great YouTube video complete...1) I recently found a great YouTube video completely debunking the "Ancient Alien" theory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9w-i5oZqaQ&t=7522s<br /><br />2) But I have not yet found a YouTube video completely debunking the "Contemporary Alien" theory. From the standpoint of the supporters of this theory, here are the 10 best claimed sightings to date: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjLkMJ_7VcU (supposedly). <br />I would like to hear from others on this blog site if they've found well-done YouTube debunking videos. Thanks.Transpoewrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12540890121217814370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-8756275452711108152018-06-14T19:08:35.922-07:002018-06-14T19:08:35.922-07:00Hello jamesrav!
You write: >> 'tic tac&...Hello jamesrav!<br /><br />You write: >> 'tic tac' shaped craft, that really should not be able to fly,<<<br /><br />I don't know, james, I've seen some cruise missiles, the tomahawk for example, that sort of resemble a tic-tac, appear to have no obvious means of propulsion, and are highly maneuverable.<br /><br />Imagine a 4X40" flying cylinder, loaded with guidance, warhead, propellant and a turbojet engine. And launched from a submarine.<br /><br />That pilot witness was "called in" from elsewhere to give chase, and he reported churning in the water as the "missile" circled before shooting away.<br /><br />Like my brilliant friend, Just sayin'.... Hmmm<br /><br />Another idea is that it might have been the test of a hypersonic vehicle, the X-43A. But to my mind that doesn't really jibe with the reports. That was at great altitude and not maneuvering--a pure design and speed test. But I could be wrong.<br /><br />http://badufos.blogspot.com/2018/06/did-nasa-hypersonic-x-43a-play-role-in.htmlzoamchomskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16519698426338891542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-45615720244174561142018-06-11T17:14:29.829-07:002018-06-11T17:14:29.829-07:00Throwing up possibilities isn't sufficient. A ...Throwing up possibilities isn't sufficient. A skeptic would look at the known events of the Nov. 14, 2004 event (the X-43A was launched two days later) and make a case that reasonably explains what radar and Navy pilots viewed. The X-43A doesn't match the time, the location, the proximity to the pilots, the altitude (it was below the F-A/18s), the movement seen on radar, etc.Roberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12539157656501925987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-24327141522769356092018-06-08T09:35:04.179-07:002018-06-08T09:35:04.179-07:00When I first heard the pilot's story about bei...When I first heard the pilot's story about being "called in" on ongoing operations, I suspected testing of some sort and/or our own ability to detect that being tested. But something other than a supersonic prototype. The report describes something circling and diving, then climbing; and something churning in the water.<br /><br />But we know very well how witnesses' perceptions and memories are distorted in their reports. <br /><br />Similarly, even though I've never seen it, only read descriptions, that "Executive Summary" sounds more like something manufactured by Elizondo after the fact of any government work. That is, a hoax, like MJ-12.<br /><br />But I could be wrong on both. At least we're digging into what is obviously all a fraudulent attempt to breathe life into the "UFO" cadaver by Bigelow, DeLonge, Elizondo and Knapp.<br /><br />Excellent, Robert! zoamchomskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16519698426338891542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-57824836898773847952018-06-06T20:25:38.485-07:002018-06-06T20:25:38.485-07:00The nimitz was roughly 100nmi south east of there....The nimitz was roughly 100nmi south east of there. How hard would it be to get the flight logs for the F/A 18's from the Nimitz for that period?Chris George Zuger - Men of Renown co-Authorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08169994310084652550noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-44349765120845743742018-06-06T20:20:33.526-07:002018-06-06T20:20:33.526-07:00Thanks for the post - I'll also note that TTSA...Thanks for the post - I'll also note that TTSA has pretty much lied about everything so far. Their changing the date very well could have been plausible deniability so that when this information came out they could point to their date and say "But ours was 2 days earlier!"<br /><br />Flat out - all we have is the account of the pilot - and soon the supposed Princeton radar commander whom put out a book in 2005 "with the account" (although the book states December 2005 and the first page says it's fiction) as the evidence presented.<br /><br />No radar data, no fight logs, nothing besides the word of two men, one who was a minor PBS celebrity for a tv show and the other with a book of fiction.<br /><br />Remember - every one of their other videos or photos has been debunked or proved to be a fraud, or something else besides what they have claimed it was. Two words. MYLAR BALLOON. That's their level of credibility. And just like that balloon - it's full of hot air and not much else.Chris George Zuger - Men of Renown co-Authorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08169994310084652550noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8104600450225406597.post-8495704807393970872018-06-06T17:07:56.359-07:002018-06-06T17:07:56.359-07:00Interesting. I sent an email out on November 4 (in...Interesting. I sent an email out on November 4 (including you) suggesting this might have played a role. I noted the two day difference as making it unlikely. However, do we really know that the event was on the 14th or is that just "tribal knowledge"? Could the "tic-tac" video have been filmed on the 16th while the encounter happened on the 14th? Inquiring minds always want to know. Don't expect the TTSA to provide anything definitive about this. Tim Printyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06115389684481839803noreply@blogger.com