Wednesday, January 16, 2019

"Project Blue Book" Flatters the Flatwoods Monster - Episode Two


Could the second episode of the monumentally misleading Project Blue Book on the "History" Channel possibly be as bad as the first? As has been said before, "Second Verse, Same as the First!"

Dr. Hynek and Mr. Malarkey find radiation while investigating the Flatwoods Monster.

Last week I presented a partial list of absurdities in the first episode. Here is this week's list:
  • Dr. Hynek did not travel to West Virginia to investigate this incident. In fact, Project Blue Book did not perform its own investigation of the Flatwoods case, but only collected a few press clippings.
  • Witnesses' eyes were not "burned," and there were no physical symptoms in anyone.
  • Debris from an alleged 'spacecraft' were not found in the woods. Nothing was found, and no object was "removed.".
  • The ground was not radioactive. 
  • The whole town did not show up and threaten to lynch the principal UFO witness, or to at least to tar-and-feather her.
  • There was no witness in a psychiatric hospital, and nobody killed themselves over this.
  • The woman whose role some have termed a 'lesbian angle' with Mimi Hynek turns out to be a Russian spy, spying on Blue Book.
  • When the boy is supposedly looking at Mars in a small telescope, they set up the telescope backwards. It is pointing at the ground, not the sky, but nobody seems to notice this.
Joe Nickell's illustration of what the witnesses
reported (left), and what they  actually saw (right).

If you want a credible account of the "Flatwoods Monster" incident, it isn't hard to find. Joe Nickell, CSI(COP)'s sole full-time researcher for lo these many years, wrote up the results of his investigation in the Skeptical Inquirer, December, 2000. The reported UFO was obviously a meteor, noting that "the fireball had been seen on a relatively horizontal trajectory in various states." So, like the Kecksburg "UFO crash" in 1965, the Flatwoods "UFO" was not just a local sighting, but actually a distant object high above the earth, seen across a very wide area. As for the "monster," Nickell agrees that it was probably a large owl sitting on a tree branch, and he sketched an illustration suggesting what they actually saw.

UFO promoters Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal,  wrote the much-cited New York Times article on December 16, 2017 that first publicly revealed the recent defense department UFO investigations launched by then-Senator Harry Reid, "Glowing Auras and 'Black Money.' They have a new UFO article in that august publication. It is about this program, Project Blue Book. They write,
The History series predictably sensationalizes and overdramatizes case investigations and the historical figures involved, adding many story elements that simply never happened. It’s already hard enough for those trying to understand the truth about government involvement with U.F.O.s without mixing fact and fiction. Nonetheless, melodrama aside, the real story is there.
What is interesting is the commentary by Mark O'Connell, author of The Close Encounters Man, a biography of Hynek. He has suggested that Hynek must be spinning in his grave because of the distortions and inventions this series. O'Connell writes on his Blog High Strangeness UFOs that he got a "surprise email" from Leslie Kean just before her latest article appeared in the New York Times, asking if he could fact check a couple of questions concerning Project Blue Book for her. He shares them with us, and I was astonished to find the following among them:
Q: Did Hynek ever crash in a plane while recreating a UFO dogfight that had been reported by a pilot?
A: That's a big NO!
Q: Did Hynek ever see what looked like an alien body floating in a tank in a secret facility, and take photos of it?
A: That's an even bigger NO!

Seriously, I never expected Leslie Kean to be as credulous and foolish as this, and so ignorant of UFO history. She seriously thought that these things might be true? It looks like I have overestimated her. (My review of her popular UFO book is here.) O'Connell says, "[Kean] has as big a problem with this show as I do, and she's going to say so in the New York Times! Halleluja!!" (emphasis in original). Unfortunately, the mild statement I quoted above seems to be as far as Kean's "big problem"with the show extends. Indeed, Kean says that "‘Project Blue Book’ Is Based on a True U.F.O. Story.". Well, loosely-based. Very loosely. She seems happy to accept any crazy thing that will promote public belief in UFOs.






5 comments:

  1. Serious man? Because she wanted to confirm those facts does not mean she actually believed they might be true. Ive been studying this field almost 30 years, particularly its history, and while I didnt believe those aspects of the show were real, I still looked it up to be sure (well the plane crash anyway). And if I was writing an article for the New York Times, I would be damn sure I double checked to make sure I was right about that. Its called doing your due diligence and basing articles on confirmed facts instead of just making stuff up about people. Obviously the alien tank thing was bogus. But I had never heard of a crash, didnt think there was one, but still double checked. You making alot of grossly absurd assumptions about Keans' credulity by giving her grief over double checking the facts before publishing a story. In fact, your entire last paragraph should just be deleted because its total nonsense. She literally says the exact opposite in no uncertain terms and yet you still proclaim she doesnt mind mixing fiction with fact if it gets UFOs publicity. Lets stick to the facts, instead of making up claims about people that are patently false.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was really looking forward to this show. After 2 weeks it wasn't what I was hoping for. As Jack Webb said "just the facts" not this nonsense

    ReplyDelete
  3. I found both episodes "entertaining" meaning that I'm fascinated with the lengths that History would go to distort/torture facts. But as they say, "The show must go on!"

    With the above said, funny that "ufologist" are outraged with the series, yet their collective outrage was missing with the Roswell Slides hoax. Carnival barkers giveth and equally taketh.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey, JimO! And I'm speaking to Tim H and Robert here too;

    The mummy-alien thing went on far too long! As did the "face on Mars." Decades! When it was stupid from the get-go!

    So totally off topic and out of order: Let's make you, JimO, the first man on Mars! It's just a TV show for Chissakes! But otherwise, if I loved you more, Carl Sagan would be jealous!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Prior to the first episode I met no one who actually thought Project Bluebook was going to be some type of documentary or anything that closely adhered to the facts. Rather, anyone who is sensible knew it would be entertainment first and the truth second. If someone here was expecting otherwise, I'd like to hear why that is...

    ReplyDelete

Keep your comments relevant, and keep them civil! That means no personal attacks will be allowed, by anyone, on anyone. Commenters are welcome to disagree with me, or with other comments, but state your arguments using logic, and with a civil tone. Comments in violation of these rules will be deleted, and offenders banned.

Comments should be in English, although quotes from foreign-language sources are fine as long as they're relevant, and you explain them. Anonymous postings are not permitted. If you don't want to use your real name, then make up a name for yourself, and use it consistently.